Rectangular Tiles: How to “Offset” Certain Installation Challenges
by Bill Griese
January 20, 2010
 |
| Scenarios where natural daylight travels parallel to a tiled
surface can exacerbate the effects of lippage. It’s best to orient patterns
such that potentially noticeable lippage is not perpendicular to the direction
of late afternoon or early morning lighting. |
|
Tile Q&A
When 8” x 8” tiles were considered large and mosaics were
common, rectangular tiles enjoyed great popularity. As 12” x 12” tiles came to
dominate, rectangular tiles were less often seen. Today, due to continuing
advances in manufacturing technology, there has been a surge and rejuvenation
of their popularity. Tile suppliers now regularly offer “rectangular versions”
in many of their product lines. Common layouts include rectangular tiles set in
brick or running bond patterns, and very long and skinny rectangular tiles set
in plank-like patterns. Another popular trend involves the new availability of
very large rectangular tiles, such as 24” x 48”, which can help achieve
slab-like looks, similar to natural stone.
Do rectangular tiles present unique challenges?
Rectangular tiles can present unique challenges to
installers when running bond patterns are used. Manufacturers strive to produce
perfectly flat tiles, but when that’s not possible, they opt to produce tiles
that are slightly “domed.” While such curvature is usually minimal, any time
the center of one tile is beside the edge of another, there could be lippage.
Also, because the length and width are different on rectangular tiles, flat
installations can be a challenge when any substrate unevenness occurs,
especially when the unevenness is along the tile’s longer edge.
When these issues arise in
conjunction with very large rectangular tiles, such as 24” x 48”, one can
imagine the difficulty in achieving successful, lippage-free installations.
That being said, very large rectangular tiles are installed successfully every
day when suitable arrangements for a flat substrate have been made and the
critical design issues: grout joint width, type of lighting, and amount of
offset, have been properly considered and addressed. These issues will each be
discussed in this article.
Are most rectangular tiles sufficiently flat?
 |
| Potential
ANSI A137.1 revisions to evaluate tiles based on individual measurements of
edge warpage could further improve the way rectangular tiles are measured and
reported. |
|
Rectangular tiles in compliance with ANSI A137.1 (American
National Standard Specifications for Ceramic Tile) are sufficiently flat for
successful lippage-free installations. In fact, the ANSI A137.1 specifications
for flatness are far more stringent than current European and ISO
specifications. However, not all ANSI-compliant tiles can be used with a 50%
offset. Even fewer can be used with a 50% offset and a narrow grout joint, and
none should be used under these circumstances if installed with wall-wash
lighting.
ANSI A137.1 defines acceptable edge warpage in terms of a
percentage of the tile’s edge length, and also sets a maximum warpage amount in
millimeters that cannot be exceeded, regardless of tile size. This maximum
value serves as a “cap,” so that allowable warpage does not exceed a reasonable
amount, even for the largest tiles. Because allowable warpage is the lesser of
the allowable percentage or maximum cap, the allowable warpage for a smaller
tile is generally limited by the percentage criteria and is well below the
maximum cap. For example, a 6” rectified porcelain tile’s maximum allowable
warpage, based on the allowable edge warpage percentage criteria, is 0.6 mm,
while a 24” calibrated tile’s maximum allowable warpage “caps out” at 1.3 mm,
or nearly 1/16”. Therefore, patterns and grout joint accommodations that work
well with smaller tiles would not work with larger tiles exhibiting the maximum
allowable warpage. Such tiles that are just barely within ANSI tolerances are
not generally recommended for offset patterns and can be highly problematic
when installed with a 50% offset and a narrow grout joint.
What challenges are commonly encountered with offset and modular patterns?
An offset pattern includes any pattern in which the end of
one tile does not line up with the end of another. As noted earlier, problems
are most common where 50% offsets are used, or wherever the center of one tile
is beside the end of another (for example, in a common brick pattern). When
such is the case, even minimal warpage can create lippage, because the highest
point on the surface of one tile is directly beside the lowest point on
another.
A modular pattern is any pattern
where multiple sizes are used in a repeating combination, for example when 24”
x 24” tiles are installed with 12” x 24”, 12” x 12”, 6” x 12”, and 6” x 6”
tiles. In such a pattern, the center of the rectangular tiles regularly lines
up next to the edge of the square tiles. Typically, each modular pattern comes
with a recommended grout width from the manufacturer for all the tiles to line
up. While these patterns are precisely calculated, all too often they are
specified with grout joints that are too narrow to minimize the effects of any
warpage or installation related lippage. While such patterns can be very
appealing, with many imported tiles, they may require varying and larger grout
widths than specified by the manufacturer to achieve the most attractive
installations with the least lippage.
How can noticeable lippage be reduced if an offset pattern or modular pattern is desired?
 |
| When
opting for an offset pattern, it is important to consider a wider grout joint
to reduce noticeable lippage. |
|
When offset or modular patterns are desired, strong
consideration should be given to the amount of offset. For large tiles
exhibiting the maximum allowable warpage, 50% offsets are guaranteed to exhibit
lippage. To address this on a practical basis, some manufacturers recommend
against any patterns with offsets in excess of 33%, if the tile being used has
any edge larger than 18 inches. When considering large tiles and offsets
greater than 33%, consumers are encouraged to consult with manufacturers for
specific recommendations.
For all tile installations, but
especially ones with offset patterns, extra precautions should be taken if a
narrow grout joint is desired. A narrow grout joint is generally considered to
be less than 1/8 of an inch. While rectangular tiles are often rectified, or
ground to precise sizing, such grinding does not remove any warpage that is
present. Even slight lippage caused by minimally warped tiles can become
increasingly noticeable as grout joints get smaller. When opting for an offset
pattern, it is important to consider a wider grout joint to reduce noticeable
lippage.
Special consideration should also be
given in scenarios where light travels parallel to a tiled surface. For walls,
this most commonly occurs with wall wash lighting. For floors, this can occur
in the early morning or late afternoon in buildings with floors adjacent to
windows facing to the east or west. Such lighting can make any existing lippage
more noticeable. With artificial lighting, it’s best to move lights away from
the wall. With natural lighting, it’s best to orient patterns such that offsets
are not perpendicular to the direction of late afternoon or early morning
lighting.
As always, special precautions should
be taken regarding preparation of a sufficiently flat substrate, proper mortar
selection, and setting adequate and reasonable lippage expectations for the
tile used and offset selected.
How are accepted practices for evaluating warpage being addressed in North America?
Although many desired patterns can be successfully installed
with rectangular tiles currently in compliance with ANSI A137.1, North American
tile manufacturers are in favor of making warpage requirements even more
stringent.
Currently, ANSI A137.1 states, “the
warpage of each tile in the sample shall conform to the value listed in the
appropriate table for that specific tile type.” While square and rectangular
tiles have four edge warpage measurements (one for each side), the standard, as
written, implies that the criteria are defined by a single value for “each
tile,” or an average of all four sides. There have been discussions among North
American tile manufacturers to revise ANSI A137.1 to evaluate tiles based on
each individual measurement of edge warpage, as opposed to the currently
implied average of all four edges for each tile. This could help further
improve the way warpage, especially for rectangular tiles, is measured and
reported. In fact, most domestic tile manufacturers already measure all four
sides of each tile exiting their kilns for edge warpage, and reject tiles based
on any single edge exceeding the allowable edge warpage values specified in
ANSI A137.1. Even with such improvements, it is important to continue taking
precaution when dealing with certain layouts, especially if a narrow grout
joint is desired.
In Summary
Rectangular tiles are regularly used in offset and modular
patterns. Such designs are very popular and, in general, can be successfully
achieved with tiles currently in compliance with ANSI A137.1. While most
rectangular tiles are sufficiently flat to achieve successful, lippage-free
installations, manufacturers are working to make tile warpage specifications
even more stringent. However, even with tiles well within ANSI tolerances,
certain precautions should be taken if a 50% offset pattern and/or narrow grout
joint is desired, and special attention should always be paid to lighting
conditions.
|